Nexight Group collaborated with the U.S. Department of Energy and UtiliSec to prepare a two-part feature article that clarifies misconceptions about the cyber security of the smart grid. Our award-winning article was aimed at utility managers and executives and delivers practical information on how to configure systems and mitigate vulnerabilities.
Utility managers and executives may be delaying smart grid investments due to uncertainties about cyber security. As utilities add smart digital devices throughout the electric grid to improve efficiency and reliability, they must ensure these devices do not increase cyber risks. Utility executives need clear, unbiased information that is sufficiently technical yet succinct to allow them to make informed choices and take needed action.
When senior utility executives understand the business case for robust cyber security, practices improve throughout the organization. We worked with cyber security experts at DOE and UtiliSec to articulate how systems can be secured and how continued public-private partnerships will be critical to future success. We synthesized multiple technical resources into priority cybersecurity challenges and leading best practices for an executive audience.
The white paper featured:
- A structured discussion of the benefits, vulnerabilities, and best practice mitigations for three widely used technologies: home area networks, advanced metering infrastructure, and phasor measurement on transmission lines
- Real-life case studies of secure architectures for each technology type
- State-of-the-art research and collaborative industry-government approaches to improving cyber security for the smart grid
Public Utilities Fortnightly, a leading journal for utility executives, excerpted the white paper in a two-part cover article for their July and August 2011 issues.
Thousands of journal copies reached top management in the energy industry through subscriptions and circulation at leading industry conferences. The two-part article won an International Award for Excellence from the Society for Technical Communication. Judges described this piece as “highly professional communication on issues of significant national importance,” with editing that “has no noticeable flaws” and information that “appears to be comprehensive and well-organized.”